Fork me on GitHub

Methods

Ecologists are focussing increasingly on explaining the structure of communities by enriching traditional food web data with additional information. Many community studies collect either the food web, species' body masses, or abundance data, and an ever increasing number of studies measure two or three of these data types and/or additional data. Various combinations of data allow different properties to be explored and different hypotheses to be tested.

Cheddar provides many relevant published methods. The examples below illustrate the different views of community data that contain different combinations of trophic links, body masses, and abundance data, following Cohen et al 2003, without going into detail. Most examples use the dataset of Tuesday Lake sampled in 1984 (Cohen et al 2003; Jonsson et al 2005).

Trophic links Body mass Numerical abundance Description
Rank of body mass
Distribution of body mass
Rank of numerical abundance
Distribution of numerical abundance
Approximate biomass abundance spectrum
Approximate numerical abundance spectrum
Constraint space defined by a convex hull
Distribution of biomass abundance
Mass-abundance allometry
Rank of biomass abundance
Basic network properties
Feeding interactions as a matrix
Food-web plotted vertically by trophic level
Intervality and diet gaps
Node connectivity categories
Omnivory
Overview of complexity
Trophic level
Trophic similarity
Trophic generality and vulnerability
Trophic species
Shortest trophic paths
Resource body mass against consumer body mass
Resource numerical abundance against consumer numerical abundance
Numerical abundance pyramid
Resource biomass abundance against consumer biomass abundance
Quantitative food-web descriptors based on information-theory indices
Biomass abundance pyramid
Tri-trophic statistics

References

Bersier, L. and Banašek-Richter, C. and Cattin, M. (2002) Ecology 80 2394-2407

Briand, F and Cohen, J.E. 1984 Community food webs have scale-invariant structure Nature 307, 264-267

Cohen, J.E. and Pimm, S.L. and Yodzis, P. and Saldana, J. 1993 Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology 62 1 67-78

Cohen, J.E. and Jonsson, T. and Carpenter, S.R. (2003) Ecological community description using the food web species abundance and body size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 4 1781-1786

Cohen, J.E. and Schittler, D.N. and Raffaelli, D.G. and Reuman, D.C. (2009) Food webs are more than the sum of their tritrophic parts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 52, 22335-22340

Jonsson, T. and Cohen J.E. and Carpenter, S. R. 2005 Food webs body size and species abundance in ecological community description. Advances in Ecological Research 36 1-84

Kerr, S.R. and Dickie, L.M. 2001 The biomass spectrum: a predator-prey theory of aquatic production. Columbia Univ Press

Leaper, R. and Raffaelli, D. (1999) Defining the abundance body-size constraint space: data from a real food web. Ecology Letters 2 3 191-199

Levine, S (1980) Several measures of trophic structure applicable to complex food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 83, 195-207

Martinez, N. D. 1991 Artifacts or attributes? Effects of resolution on the Little Rock Lake food web. Ecological Monographs 61, 367-392

Pimm, S.L. and Lawton, J.H. and Cohen, J.E. 1991 Food web patterns and their consequences Nature 350, 669-674

Polis, G. A. (1991) Complex desert food webs: an empirical critique of food web theory. American Naturalist 138, 123-155

Stouffer, D.B. and Camacho, J. and Amaral, L.A.N. (2006) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 50, 19015-19020

Williams, R.J. and Martinez, N.D. (2000) Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404, 180-183

Williams, R. J. and Martinez, N. D. (2004) Limits to Trophic Levels and Omnivory in Complex Food Webs: Theory and Data. American Naturalist 163, 63, 458-468.

Zook, A.E. and Eklof, A. and Jacob, U. and Allesina, S. (2011) Journal of Theoretical Biology 271, 1 106-113